[ Analysis ] The Great Incontinent
The journal Le Grand Continent is populated with acid-dropping cabalists. It claims that the Trump administration wants a regime change in Europe.
Diplomacy seeks to persuade. Failing that, it aims to influence. And when influence falls short, it strives to convince. Beyond these efforts lies the realm of conflict—whether economic, informational, cultural, or military.
Who are these figures in Washington, in power since January 2025, bold enough to articulate a transparent foreign policy, detailing its goals, strategies, and tools? They do so unabashedly on the U.S. State Department’s official Substack, these audacious upstarts!
Who are these ominous people, led by an Orange Outrage, who have dismantled USAID, a $45-billion annual behemoth of global corruption that enriched consultancies and NGOs with negligible humanitarian impact, providing fertile ground for Ivy League graduates to “save the world” one cocktail party and one regime change at the time?
Rather than flooding social media with self-promotion, State Department officials are now publishing substantive policy pieces. Writing with purpose—what gall!—instead of funneling funds to Europe’s sycophants, as their predecessors did since the end of World War II. Take Najat Vallaud-Belkacem1, previously well-compensated by a Clinton-linked outfit—One Campaign—now maneuvering to secure a cushy job at France’s Court of Accountants to maintain her lifestyle.
The Trump administration is resolute in dismantling the entrenched Washington establishment, including its European extensions-Europe where key deep-state players have already sought refuge. Some may argue this undermines democracy. Hardly, as the goal is not to curtail fundamental freedoms or impose authoritarian rule, but to reassert political control over core governmental functions and the vast budgets that support them. This marks a return to principled governance, with bureaucracy restored to its proper role as an executor, not an independent power.
Our concern is not whether we endorse the policies of Donald Trump and his administration. We are not Americans. Rather, it is about methodically discerning the intentions and actions of the U.S. government. Journalism deals in facts, not opinions.
Here comes Le Grand Continent, the Macronist, Euro-federalist publication that styles itself as “the premier European journal”—in truth, little more than a glossy fanzine of the École Normale Supérieure, one of France’s elite schools, where it has its offices at 45 rue d’Ulm—plunging headlong into rampant conspiracy theorizing.
Another NGO masquerading as a news outlet, bankrolled by magnanimous, ostensibly impartial donors, its editorial stance—of course independent and rigorously objective—exists solely to enlighten the public. What agenda, or whose, is being advanced here?
Le Grand Continent provides its take on an article by Samuel Samson, a senior U.S. State Department official.
Le Grand Continent asserts that the Trump administration is pursuing regime change in Europe.
These individuals are unhinged, unable to engage with a straightforward text without compulsively searching for hidden meanings, as if they were hallucinated mystics, decoding secrets only they, the chosen few, can unravel through esoteric practices honed at elite Parisian soirées.
Their interpretation is steeped in paranoia, ascribing to the author only motives that feed their delusions. Paranoia, it bears repeating, is a psychosis grounded in the rejection of reality—where facts and experience are dismissed, offering no corrective to rigid dogma.