Los Angeles : "Mostly Peaceful Riots"
The Democratic Party strategically planned street protests in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election. During the 1992 Los Angeles riots, George H. W. Bush implemented the same tactics as Trump.
This is the English translation of the article published on April, 10, 2025.
In the United States, federal law stands apart from state law. Federal law governs the entire nation uniformly, whereas state law holds sway only within the boundaries of each individual state.
In the United States, the federal government holds sole authority over border control and immigration. Agencies like ICE and CBP, operating under the Department of Homeland Security, enforce the relevant laws, while federal courts handle their adjudication.
Responsibility for maintaining public order lies with local police forces, whether municipal or county. In the city of Los Angeles, the LAPD takes charge, while in Los Angeles County, the sheriff’s department handles this duty. State police may also provide support.
Should local law enfrocement prove unable to restore order, the U.S. President has the authority to deploy the National Guard, which is tasked to protect critical federal infrastructure.
In Los Angeles, rioters assaulted federal officers on duty and attacked an ICE detention facility. When local authorities proved incapable—or unwilling—to restore order, Donald Trump mobilized 2,000 National Guard troops to bolster the LAPD and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, acting well within legal bounds. Historical precedent exists: in 1992, George H. W. Bush deployed the National Guard, Army, and Marines to suppress the “Rodney King” riots in the same city, as documented by contemporary footage. Contrary to the media’s relentless narrative, Trump’s response is far from unprecedented.
The current riots are fueled by segments of society resisting the enforcement of immigration laws, specifically the arrest, detention, and deportation of undocumented immigrants. This scenario was strategically rehearsed by the Democratic Party in a simulation prior to the 2020 presidential election.
For deeper insights into the root causes of the riots, we recommend reviewing the analysis provided by Michael Shellenberger.
We urge you to revisit our January 2023 analysis, which exposes the collapse of so-called progressive policies in the states and major cities where they were implemented, ushering in a modern form of feudalism. A privileged minority, having monopolized public resources for its own benefits, exploits a migrant underclass as servants while maintaining widespread insecurity - economic included- among the working and middle class to stifle any potential protest.
Let’s sharpen our lens to reveal political dynamics that reach well beyond California’s borders.
Since Donald Trump’s 2016 victory, Democrats, in collusion with mainstream media, have weaponized violence from certain groups and well funded organizations for political gain. The Black Lives Matter movement and the riots sparked by George Floyd’s death—likely due to a fentanyl overdose and a pelvic tumor—come to mind. Those riots, a deliberate political maneuver launched six months before the 2020 election, echoed the CIA’s tactics in orchestrating color revolutions and Arab Spring uprisings abroad.
![[ George Floyd’s Death ] The Truth Is Breaking Through](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_140,h_140,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-video.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fvideo_upload%2Fpost%2F164396898%2Fa0619b9e-c281-4544-90d6-8dec89d47f41%2Ftranscoded-1748157991.png)
We all vividly recall how Democrats manipulated federal authority to sabotage Trump’s first term. The “Russiagate” probe, a baseless hoax crafted by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the blanket suppression of the New York Post’s exposé on Hunter Biden’s laptop—laying bare the Biden family’s deep-seated corruption—and the unyielding legal onslaught Trump endured throughout Joe Biden’s presidency, designed to block his return to the ballot, remain etched in memory.